دوره 8، شماره 15 - ( بهار و تابستان 1400 )                   جلد 8 شماره 15 صفحات 45-34 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


دانشگاه پیام نور تهران ، ایران
چکیده:   (2545 مشاهده)
    ارزش‌گذاری اقتصادی اماکن تاریخی واقع در روستاها، معرفی و شناساندن آن به مخاطبان و درک اهمیت استراتژیک وجود چنین موهبت‌هایی، کلیدی‌ترین اقدام برای برنامه‌ریزی توسعه روستایی، ایجاد و رونق اشتغال و تولید و توسعه بوم­ گردی است. این مطالعه تمایل به پرداخت حفاظتی بازدیدکنندگان از دژ تاریخی قلعه‌رودخان را از طریق ارزش­ گذاری مشروط با روش انتخاب یک‌و‌نیم بعدی برآورد می‌کند. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد 75 درصد افراد در برنامه حفاظت از دژ تاریخی قلعه‌رودخان تمایل به پرداخت دارند. میانگین تمایل به پرداخت حفاظتی در کل افراد نمونه، معادل 22650ریال و مازاد رفاه سالانه بازدیدکنندگان 38/5 میلیارد تومان برآورد شده است. گروه مخالفان نیز دلایلی مانند: وظیفه دولت بودن (38 درصد)، پرداخت توسط ساکنان روستا (6 درصد)، مشارکت توسط بازدیدکنندگان غیربومی (56 درصد) را اعلام کردند. پیشنهاد شد مبالغ دریافتی از بازدیدکنندگان بر اساس اولویت ابتدا برای ترمیم قسمت­ های آسیب­ دیده و در حال تخریب این دژ تاریخی جهت سرپا نگه­داشتن این بنای ارزشمند اختصاص ­یافته و سپس جهت آموزش و برگزاری برنامه­ های ترویج حفاظت از محیط زیست و ابنیه تاریخی تخصیص و هزینه شود. حفظ این بنای تاریخی ارزشمند منجر به ایجاد اشتغال، مهاجرت معکوس اهالی روستا از شهر به دیار خود، رشد اقتصادی روستا، احیاء و رونق صنایع دستی منطقه خواهد شد.
متن کامل [PDF 1088 kb]   (598 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: کارآفرینی در کشاورزی
دریافت: 1399/10/22 | پذیرش: 1400/2/26 | انتشار: 1400/5/26

فهرست منابع
1. Arayesh, M.B. 2017. Mechanisms of rural tourism development in the natural area: a case study of Hyderabad village, Ilam city. Village and development, 19(4): 121-141 (In Persian).
2. Amirnejad, H. 2007. Natural Resources Economics. Javadaneh Publications of Jangal, Tehran, Iran.
3. Ardakani, S., H. Hatami Nasab, F. Nikzad and R. Taleifar. 2008. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Performance of Tourism Institutions. Proceedings of the Seminar on Tourism and Development, Semnan, 18 pp.
4. Bishop Richard, C. and A. Thomas. 1979. Heberlein: Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6: 926-30. [DOI:10.2307/3180348]
5. Cheraghi, S. and Sh. Choobchian. 2017. Identifying the factors hindering the development of entrepreneurship in the field of renewable energy in the agricultural sector, Iran. Journal of Entrepreneurship Strategies in Agriculture, 4(8). [DOI:10.29252/jea.4.8.23]
6. Cooper, J.C. and J. loomis. 1992. Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models. Land Economics, 68(2): 211-224. [DOI:10.2307/3146775]
7. Cooper, J.C., M. Hanemann and G. Signorello. 2002. One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4): 742-750. [DOI:10.1162/003465302760556549]
8. Copper, J.C. 1993. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24: 25-40. [DOI:10.1006/jeem.1993.1002]
9. Del-Saz, S. and I. Guaita. 2013. On the value of drovers' routes as environmental assets: A contingent valuation approach. Land Use Policy, 32: 78-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.006]
10. Dom'ınguez-Torreiro, M. and M. Solino. 2016. Pricing a rural development program: uncertainty, indifference and protest behaviors. Agricultural Economics, 47: 559-569. [DOI:10.1111/agec.12255]
11. Ezkia, M. and Gh. Ghaffari. 2009. Rural Development with Emphasis on Rural Society of Iran: Tehran. Ney.
12. Faridi, A. and M. Kavousi Kalashmi. 2020. Financial evaluation and presentation of the business environment of ecotourism project in Guilan province (Case study: Masal region). Journal of Entrepreneurship Strategies in Agriculture, 7(13).
13. Guo, Z., X. Xiao, Y. Gan and Y. Zheng. 2001. Ecosystem functions, services and their values a case study in Xingshan country of China. Ecological Economics, 38: 141-154. [DOI:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00154-9]
14. Hanemann, M. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3): 332-341. [DOI:10.2307/1240800]
15. Hosseini, A. and S. Hosseini. 2009. An Analysis of the Tourism Situation (A Case Study of Hazaveh in Arak). Zagros Vision Geographical Quarterly, 1(1): 111-181.
16. Kanninen, B.J. 1993. Optimal experimental design Double-Bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land economics, 69(2): 138-146. [DOI:10.2307/3146514]
17. Karami, A., N. Baran and A. Eskandari. 2019. Investigating the effects of agricultural ecotourism on economic, social and environmental development in rural areas of Sistan. Village and development, 22(2): 65-86 (In Persian).
18. Kazemi, M. and F. Arhami. 2017. Entrepreneurship Development in Rural Tourism: A Case Study of Mashhad Metropolitan Villages. Village and development, 20(3): 1-16 (In Persian).
19. Khaksar Astaneh, H., M. Daneshvar, V. Kalateh Arabi, and S.M. Akbari. 2011. Estimation of recreational value of forest parks in Mashhad using conditional valuation method (CVM). Agricultural Economics Research, 3(2): pp. 78-61 (In Persian).
20. Kristrom, B. 1997. Spike models in contingent valuation models. Am. J. Agr. Econ, 79(3): 1013-1023. [DOI:10.2307/1244440]
21. Lehtonen, E., J. Kuuluvainen, E. Pouta, M. Rekola and L. Zh. 2003. Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland. Environmental Science and Policy, 6: 195-204. [DOI:10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00035-2]
22. Lordkipanidze, M., H. Brezet and M. Backman. 2005. The Entrepreneurship Factor inSustainable Tourism Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13: 787-798. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.043]
23. Mitchell, R. and R. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
24. Molaei, M. 2012. Comparison of Design Methods for Proposed Amounts in Conditional Valuation Method with Double Bound Selection. Quarterly Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 21(81): 152-131 (In Persian).
25. Mousavi, S.N. 2015. Estimating the economic-recreational valuation of Khafr waterfall and recreation area and determining the factors affecting the willingness to pay using the conditional valuation method (CVM). Journal of Regional Planning, 5(18): 157-170 (In Persian).
26. Nakhaei, N., S. Mortazavi, H. Amirnejad and M. Nawazi. 2010. Estimation of conservation value of Noor Forest Park using conditional valuation method. Agricultural Economics, 4(1): 171-189 (In Persian).
27. Pandi, K. 2005. Land and people of Fumanat. Rasht: Haghshenas Publications.
28. Raheli, H., R. Heidari-Chianeh and M. Khodavardizadeh. 2013. Estimating the recreational value and examining the factors affecting the willingness of tourists to pay from the ruined mill waterfall using the conditional valuation method. Journal of Geography and Planning, 17(44): 95-117 (In Persian).
29. Rahmani, Z. and M. Haji-Rahimi. 2014. Estimation of conservation value of Sarvabad oak forests using conditional valuation method. Third National Conference on Natural Resources Research of Iran with a focus on the environment, Kurdistan, University of Kurdistan.
30. Rajabi, M. and S. Mousavi. 2014. Estimation of tourism and conservation values of Naghsh Jahan Square in Isfahan (application of conditional valuation method). Financial Economics, 8(27): 127-152 (In Persian).
31. Reynisdottir, M., H. Song and J. Agrusa. 2008. Willingness to Pay Entrance Fees to Natural Attractions: An Icelandic Case Study. Tourism Management, 29: 1076-1083. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.016]
32. Saboohi, M. and K. Atai-Solout. 2014. Application of One-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice (OOHB) in conditional valuation to determine the consumer surplus of tourists in Si Sangan Forest Park. Environmental Science, 40(2): 439-450 (In Persian).
33. Sahabi, B.M., H. Hajian, and B. Javaheri. 2011. Factors affecting the willingness to pay visitors and estimating the recreational value of Jajroud region. Journal of Economic Modeling, 6(17): 111-126 (In Persian).
34. Sam Daliri, A., H. Amirnejad and S. Mortazavi. 2013. Estimating the willingness of the residents of Chalous city to pay for the protection of Lake Velesht using the conditional valuation method with double one-and-a-half dimensional selection. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2(5): 1-13 (In Persian).
35. Schuhman, P.W., R. Skeet, R. Waite, T. Lorde, P. Bangwayo-Skeete, H.A. Oxenford, D. Gill, W. Moore and F. Spencer. 2019. Visitors' willingness to pay marine conservation fees in Barbados. Tourism Management, 71: 315-326. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.011]
36. Sharpley, J. and R. Sharpley. 1997. Rural tourism: An introduction. London: International Thomson Business Press.
37. Sharpley, R. 2002. Rural "Tourism and the Challenge of Tourism Diversification". Tourism Management, 23: 233-244. [DOI:10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00078-4]
38. Strazzera, E., M. Genius, R. Scarpa and G. Hutchinson. 2003. The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Env. Resour. Econ, 25(4): 461-476. [DOI:10.1023/A:1025098431440]
39. Strazzera, E., R. Scarpa, P. Calia, G.D. Garrod and K.G. Willis. 2003. Modelling zero values and protest responses in contingent valuation surveys. Appl. Econ, 35(2): 133-138. [DOI:10.1080/0003684022000015900]
40. Torreiro, M.D. and M. Solino. 2016. Pricing a rural development program: uncertainty, indifference, and protest behaviors. Agricultural economics, 47: 559-569. [DOI:10.1111/agec.12255]
41. Zhao, W., J.R. Brent Ritchie, C.M. Echtner. 2011. Social capital and tourism entrepreneurship. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4): 1570-1593. [DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2011.02.006]

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.