دوره 7، شماره 14 - ( پاییز و زمستان 1399 )                   جلد 7 شماره 14 صفحات 87-94 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

bahmani A, zamanian A, aslani F. Explaining The Mediating Role of Empathy in The Relationship Between Psychological Capital and Social Entrepreneurship of Rural Women (Case Study: Choobast Village). jea. 2021; 7 (14) :87-94
URL: http://jea.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-235-fa.html
بهمنی اکبر، زمانیان علیرضا، اصلانی فرشید. تبیین نقش میانجی همدلی در ارتباط بین سرمایه های روان شناختی و کارآفرینی اجتماعی زنان روستایی (مورد مطالعه: زنان روستای چوب بست). راهبردهای کارآفرینی در کشاورزی. 1399; 7 (14) :87-94

URL: http://jea.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-235-fa.html


گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
چکیده:   (250 مشاهده)
ارتقای مشارکت زنان و دستیابی به اهداف برابری جنسیتی به­ گونه‌ای مطرح شده که پیشرفت و مشارکت زنان، محور اساسی توسعه­ ی پایدار را تشکیل داد. کارآفرینی یک راهبرد مناسب برای مبارزه با فقر و نگاه داشت ثروت در جوامع کم­ درآمد است. تحقیق حاضر به­ منظور تبیین نقش میانجی همدلی در ارتباط بین سرمایه­ های روان­شناختی و کارآفرینی اجتماعی زنان روستای چوب بست انجام شد. روش تحقیق توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی می­ باشد. جامعه­ ی آماری پژوهش زنان روستای چوب بست به تعداد 162 نفر در سال 1399 بودند. نمونه­ ها به­ روش سرشماری به تعداد 162 نفر انتخاب شدند. ابزار اندازه ­گیری پرسشنامه استاندارد بود. به­ منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده ­ها از مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده گردید. نتایج تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها نشان داد که بین سرمایه­ ی روان­شناختی و کارآفرینی اجتماعی زنان رابطه معنی­ داری وجود دارد. همچنین، سرمایه­ ی روانشناختی بر کارآفرینی اجتماعی با نقش میانجی همدلی با ضریب 0/48 تأثیر معنی­ داری دارد.
 
متن کامل [PDF 477 kb]   (74 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: کارآفرینی در کشاورزی
دریافت: 1399/6/19 | پذیرش: 1399/9/29 | انتشار: 1399/12/12

فهرست منابع
1. Austin, J., H. Stevenson and J. Wei-Skillern. 2006. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1): 1-22. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x]
2. Badzaban, F., K. Rezaei-Moghaddam and M. Fatemi. 2020. Entrepreneurship in small and medium-sized enterprises of rural women of Fars province: Application of Lifespan Resilience Scale-Business (LRS-B). Journal of Entrepreneurial Strategies in Agriculture, 7(13): 12-23 (In Persian).
3. Bondora, N. 2011. Business Development Services Support Project, Annual Progress Report. Canadian International Development Agency, Association of Canadian Community Colleges and Emerging Markets Group Canada. Business Development Services (BDS): How To Guide, DO - 10.13140/RG.2.1.3845.1925.
4. Farhanfar, M., M. Nadi and H. Molavi. 2015. Involvement and Empathy with Aggression Among High School Students. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 5(1): 67-80. (In Persian).
5. Geeta, G. 2010. Women education and socioeconomical development, reaserch. Available from: http:// hamzaban.org/category and.J.
6. Heidari, V. and A. Majnooni. 2017. The role of psychological capital in promoting rural entrepreneurship in East Azerbaijan province. Quarterly Journal of Space Economy and Rural Development, 6(22): pp 97-118 (In Persian).
7. Kermani, M., M. Mazloom Khorasani, H. Behravan and M. Noghani Dokhtebahmani. 2016. Empowerment Based on Social Entrepreneurship: Presenting a Grounded Theory (A Case Study of the Headquarters for Empowering Female Householders at Tehran Municipality). Journal of Social Sciences (Biannual), 12(2): 107-136. [DOI:10.22067/jss.v12i2.33507 (In Persian).]
8. Hoveida, R., H. Mokhtari and M. Forohar. 2012. The relationship between psychological capital and organizational commitment components. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2): 43-56 (In Persian).
9. Kyro, P. 2015. To grow or not to grow? Entrepreneurship and sustainable development, Cited in Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development Research, Alato University, Finland. 8:1, 15-28, DOI: 10.1080/13504500109470059. [DOI:10.1080/13504500109470059]
10. Lambrechts, W., M. Caniëls, I. Molderez and R. Venn. 2020. Unraveling the Role of Empathy and Critical Life Events as Triggers for Social Entrepreneurship. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 579500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579500. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579500]
11. Luthans, F. 2004. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 23: 695-706. [DOI:10.1002/job.165]
12. Luthans, F. and C.M. Youssef. 2010. Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2): 143-160. [DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003]
13. Martin, L. and S. Osberg. 2012. Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition, Stanford Social Innovation Review. Spring, 28-39.
14. Mohammad Shafiee, M., A. Haghshenas and A. Afrough. 2016. Empathy in the Organization with a Focus on the Role of Spirituality in the Workplace with a Spiritual Leadership Approach (Case Study: Isfahan University Staff), Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran, Tehran, Modbar Management Research Institute, University of Tehran, (In Persian).
15. Porcar, A.T., A.M. Tur and J.M. Belso. 2017. Barriers to wom entrepreneurship. Different methods, different results? Springer, 1(1): 1-16. DOI 10.1007/s11135-016-0343-0.
16. Pratt, M.W., M.L. Arnold and H. Lawford. 2009. Growing towards Care: A Narrative Approach to Prosocial Moral Identity and Generativity of Personality in Emerging Adulthood. In D. Narvaez and D.K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology, pp: 295-315. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511627125.014]
17. Rahmanifar, Z. 2017. Designing a Social Entrepreneurship Model for Women Heads of Households with Children in Tehran, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Tehran (In Persian).
18. Ranjbar, S. 2015. Investigating the effect of communication on creating organizational empathy among the employees of Bojnourd Labor, Cooperation and Social Welfare Office; International Conference on Culture and Development Management. Economic; holy Mashhad (In Persian).
19. Rashid, Kh. and A. Bayat. 2019. The Relationship between the Dimensions of Psychological Capitals and the Components of Emotional Empathy mediated by Aesthetic Intelligence. Psychological sciences, 18(74): 171-180 (In Persian).
20. Román, S.M. and G. Brändle. 2016. Abilities and skills as factors explaining thedifferences in women entrepreneurship. Suma De Negocios, 3(1): 5-9.
21. Roshan Ghias, K., A. Ahmadi and F. Mohebbi. 2018. Social entrepreneurship relationship survey on social inconveniences reduction (case study: recovered addict in Qazvin city). 1396(23): 66-83 (In Persian).
22. Stwort, A. 2007. Studying the Effects of Women's Education on Power Distribution in the Family, Tehran, Azad University, Sciences and Researches Branch, (In Persian).
23. Tajabadi, R., M. Rahimi and S. Shabani. 2013. Approaches to women's empowerment in the field of entrepreneurship (with emphasis on information technology). National Conference on Entrepreneurship University (Knowledge-Based Industry), 1-22, (In Persian).
24. Thomas, M. 2002. Empathy style profile: Mini questionnaire report. USA: Profiles.
25. Tracey, P. and N. Phillips. 2014. The Distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs, A Postscript and Rejoinder to the Special Issue on Entrepreneurship Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(2): 264-271. [DOI:10.5465/amle.2007.25223465]
26. Valizadeh, N. and H. Karimi-Gougheri. 2018. An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Social Entrepreneurial Intention in Rural and Nomad Women's Micro-credit Funds. Journal of Entrepreneurial Strategies in Agriculture, 5(9): 10-20 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jea.5.9.10]
27. Yaqouti, M. 2015. Investigating the effective factors in improving communication and creating organizational empathy in the Workers' Welfare Bank of Khorasan Province, National Conference on Humanities, Shiraz, New Education Development Center, Iran, (In Persian).
28. Zahra, M. 2015. Taking Aim at Empowermentresearch: On the Distinction between Individual and Psychological Conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18: 169-177 (In Persian). [DOI:10.1007/BF00922695]

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به راهبردهای کارآفرینی در کشاورزی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Entreneurship and Agriculture

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb