Volume 6, Issue 11 (9-2019)
jea 2019, 6(11): 68-76 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aghajaniafrouzi A, YadolahiFarsi J, Ahmadpour Dariani M, Motavasseli M. (2019). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Financial Performance of Agricultural Family Businesses. jea. 6(11), 68-76. doi:10.29252/jea.6.11.68
URL: http://jea.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-189-en.html
URL: http://jea.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-189-en.html
Tehran University
Abstract: (2546 Views)
In recent years, with the growth of studies in the field of family business, research on the corporate social responsibility has increased in parallel. Regarding the importance of social responsibility studies in the field of family business, the present study identifies the component of corporate social responsibility in order to investigate its impact on family business performance in Mazandaran province. In this regard, a descriptive survey method using structural equation model was used in this research. In order to, a researcher-made questionnaire of 67 questions with a five-point Likert questionnaire was used to collect data. A simple stratified sampling method was used to select a sample of 125 active business owners in Mazandaran Province Cooperation and Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture Chambers. The data were analyzed by PLS software and the findings showed that the impact of customer social responsibility with a factor of 84 percent had the greatest impact on the financial performance of the company.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
هنجارهای اجتماعی و فرهنگی
Received: 2019/07/31 | Accepted: 2019/09/18 | Published: 2019/10/6
Received: 2019/07/31 | Accepted: 2019/09/18 | Published: 2019/10/6
References
1. Abeysekera A.P. and S.F. Chitru. 2018. Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective, Journal of Corporate Finance, In press, corrected proof, Available online 21. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.05.003]
2. Alfonso Dau, L., S.A. Purkayastha and K. Eddleston. 2018. Who does it best? Family and nonfamily owners and leaders navigating institutional development in emerging markets, Journal of Business Research, In press, corrected proof, Available online 7.
3. Barnett, M.L. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 794-816. [DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.25275520]
4. Bergamaschi, M. and K. Randerson. 2015. The futures of family businesses and the development of corporate social responsibility, Published by Elsevier L td, 1-12.
5. Burrell, G. and G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life, Heinemann educational Books Ltd, London (In Persian).
6. Campopiano, Giovanna; Massis, Alfredo de and Chirico, Francesco. 2014, Journal of Family Business Review, 27(3): 244-258. [DOI:10.1177/0894486514538450]
7. Carroll, A.B. 1991. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibiiity: Toward the Morai Management of Organizational Stakeholders, journal of Business horizons, 34(4): 39-48. [DOI:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G]
8. Cruz, C., M. Larraza‐Kintana, L. Garcés‐Galdeano and P. Berrone. 2014. Are Family Firms Really More Socially Responsible?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38: 1295-1316. [DOI:10.1111/etap.12125]
9. Fernando, Y. and X.W. Wen. 2017. The impact of eco-innovation drivers on environmental performance: Empirical results from the green technology sector in Malaysia, journal of sustainable production and consumption, 12: 27-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2017.05.002]
10. Fombrun, C. 2001. Corporate reputations as economic assets. In M. Hitt, R. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: P: 289-312. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11. Gras-Gil, E., M.P. Manzano and H. Fernández Joaquín. 2016. Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Spain, Business Research Quarterly, 19: 289-299. [DOI:10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.002]
12. Kruger, Philipp. 2015. Corporate Goodness and Shareholder wealth, journal of finance Economics, 115(2): 304-329. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008]
13. Lien, Y.C. and I. Filatotchev. 2015. Ownership characteristics as determinants of FDI location decisions in emerging economies, Journal of World Business, 50(4): 637-650. [DOI:10.1016/j.jwb.2014.09.002]
14. Liu, W., H. Yang and G. Zhang. 2012. Does family business excel in firm performance? An institution-based view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 965-987. [DOI:10.1007/s10490-010-9216-6]
15. Neubauer, F. and A.G. Lank. 2015. The family business: Its governance for sustainability. books.google.com
16. Parhizgar, M.M. and A.A. Aghajani Afrouzi. 2012. Advanced Research Methodology in Management with Applied Approach, © Payam e noor university Publishing (In Persian).
17. Peake Whitney, O., D. Cooper, M. Fitzgerald and A. Glenn Muske. 2015. Family Business Participation in Community Social Responsibility: The Moderating Effect of Gender, Springer Science+Business Media [DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2716-z]
18. Pino, G., C. Amatulli, M. De Angelis and M.A. Peluso. 2015. The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumers' attitudes and intentions toward genetically modified foods: evidence from Italy, Journal of Cleaner Production, October, pp: 1-9.
19. Preslmayer, C., M. Kuttner and B. Feldbauer-Durstmüller. 2018. Uncovering the research field of corporate social responsibility in family firms: a citation analysis, Journal of Family Business Management, 8(2): 169-195. [DOI:10.1108/JFBM-10-2017-0032]
20. Sayekti, yosefa. 2015. Strategic Corporate social Responsibility(CSR), Company financial performance and Earning response Coefficient: Empirical Evidence on Indonesian Listed Companies, Procedia- social and behavioral sciences, 211: 411-420. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.054]
21. Stevens, R., N. Moray, J. Bruneel and B. Clarysse. 2014. Attention Allocation to Multiple Goals: The case of for-profit social Entreprises, Strategic Management journal, 36: 1006-1016. [DOI:10.1002/smj.2265]
22. Zhang, M., L. Xie, and Xu. Haoran. 2015. Corporate Philanthropy and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China, Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3): 595-617. [DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2647-8]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
